Wednesday, January 04, 2006

I AM M.D.E.

My name is Michael Brodkorb and I am Minnesota Democrats Exposed. I had previously stated that I would never reveal my identity. I may have been naive to think I would be able to expose Democrats in the land of Hubert H. Humphrey, Walter Mondale and Paul Wellstone, while keeping my true identity a secret. In the end, my identity is being unveiled today because of lawsuit filed against me by a prominent Democrat consultant. The Democrat who filed this lawsuit did not contact Domains by Proxy to confirm my identity. Instead, I was served legal papers at my home last evening. I decided that I would expose myself on my own blog, in my own words, rather than my identity being eventually confirmed in court documents. Minnesota Democrats Exposed is not coming to an end. To quote a line from "A Few Good Men": "I eat breakfast 80 yards away from 4000 Cubans who are trained to kill me. So don't for one second think you're gonna come down here, flash a badge, and make me nervous." I don't want anyone to think a lawsuit filed against me by prominent Democrat consultant is going to make me nervous and end my blog. Minnesota Democrats Exposed will still be a blog dedicated to a truthful discussion on the activities, statements, and tactics of Minnesota Democrats. It is a testament to my hard work and the work of hundreds of people who have emailed me information on Minnesota Democrats that in the end, a lawsuit filed by a prominent Democrat consultant forced my identity to be revealed. Democrats in Minnesota clearly benefit from a blog called Minnesota Democrats Exposed ceasing to exist and I am sure the mind of the Democrat consultant who filed the lawsuit against me, he will be a hero inside the offices of the Minnesota DFL Party. I am sure some Democrats in Minnesota will think the lawsuit filed against me by a prominent Democrat consultant is wrong and petty. I have never been paid to blog, nor has anyone I have every worked for or contracted with known that I am truly M.D.E. My blog is not created, endorsed, sponsored, or authorized by any political party, candidate, or candidate's committee. I hope my friends and colleagues who worked with me everyday and never knew that I was M.D.E. understand why I never told them. This blog has never been about me, but rather exposing Minnesota Democrats. I want to thank the Republicans and Democrats who have emailed me tips exposing Minnesota Democrats. I have and never will reveal my sources and this lawsuit will not change my commitment to protecting my sources' identity. I also need to thank anyone who every visited Minnesota Democrats Exposed. Personally, I believe that today is a great day in the history of Minnesota Democrats Exposed. But I have great concerns about the rights of anonymous bloggers. This lawsuit is an attempt to silence anonymous bloggers and for that I am sad. I never used my right to remain anonymous as a license to post lies. I stand by my work and I will vigorusly defend myself in court. But this lawsuit will raise legal questions about the rights of anonymous bloggers and free speech. I look forward to finally being a public advocate for the rights of anonymous bloggers. Sadly, it is also well known to the readers of Minnesota Democrats Exposed that I have received numerous threats of violence against me for exposing Minnesota Democrats. I am prepared for what ever form people chose to use to complaint about Minnesota Democrats Exposed. I am very excited about finally meeting the bloggers behind some of my favorate blogs and attending a future Minnesota Organization of Blogs' event. On happy note, tomorrow evening I will be celebrating with a "coming out party." Please join me at Loto's in downton St. Paul starting at 6:00 p.m. Republicans and Democrats are invited and I encourage you all to attend. Thank you for visting Minnesota Democrats Exposed and I hope you check back tomorrow for more posts exposing Minnesota Democrats. I am Michael Brodkorb and I am Minnesota Democrats Exposed.

17 comments:

  1. Thanks for being brave, Michael. I've admired it ever since I started reading your blog. Yours was the first blog I came upon and inspired me to start my own. Thanks for all you've done. Words can't express how grateful I am (and I'm sure many bloggers are) for the work you've done on MDE. Keep fighting. We're behind you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I applaud you on this couragous decision. I look forward to meeting you at a future MOB event.

    Curious as to why you choose to say 'prominent Democrat consultant' while not actually naming the individual(s). Isn't it a matter of public record anyway?

    Kurt 'Flash'
    Centrisity.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. Michael,

    Best of luck. Always know that people all around the state will support you if trouble arises. Plus, you could always move out to the boonies if the whackos get to rabid in their attacks.

    Keep up the great work.

    ReplyDelete
  4. RE:"Curious as to why you choose to say 'prominent Democrat consultant' while not actually naming the individual(s). Isn't it a matter of public record anyway?"

    Further reading around the blogoshpere, I now completely understand.

    Flash

    ReplyDelete
  5. Appearing in PIM may not be a "brightside." I'd call it "downgrade."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Michael, don't hurt your elbow so much from patting yourself on the back.

    You are a political operative. You can't have it both ways. You are a coward.

    I'm just a guy who cares about what happens to my state. You published my home address and phone number. You are a hypocrite.

    Tim Ward

    ReplyDelete
  7. I still think I am MDE! Seriously, I hope to meet you at Keegan's sometime.

    See you at Keegan's sometime?
    Jerry (SD63)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Another blow to free speech from the left.

    Sorry about the lawsuit, I hope you can counter sue and kick their ass.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ditto to what Tracey wrote, word for word!

    ReplyDelete
  10. In my opinion (I believe I'm still able to have one of the without getting sued, right?), Blois is (mis)using the court to bring publicity to himself and his business. He knows he can't win this thing.

    1) What are the damages? Can he prove financial damages? I really, really doubt it.

    2) He's a public figure. He's widely known in politics, he's a TV personality (for whatever that's worth being on Ch. 2).

    3) As AP reported, your claim is true. A jury of your peers would have to give you the benefit of the doubt that Humphrey wasn't working on behalf of Blois' company when he approached Rowley's people. There is reasonable doubt - either he was working on behalf of New School or he was trying to dig up a side job. Since there's likely nothing in writing, there is reasonable doubt.

    The bottom line? To me, he's spending money on an attorney for one reason - publicity to his company and PIM (a worthless rag if ever there was one - again, in my humble opinion). He'll get his fifteen minutes at your expense, sorry to say.

    Keep your chin up.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Michael,

    I know that there are many of us who were anxious to meet the man behind the myth that is MDE. While loosing your anonynimity makes it harder to do what you have been doing, I have no doubts that you will still be able to carry on and fight the fight. I look forward to seeing you at a future MOB event!

    ReplyDelete
  12. what exactly have you ever 'exposed' about these dastardly Democrats?

    ReplyDelete
  13. "I eat breakfast ..." Uh ... if I recall the movie, things didn't turn out too well for Mr. don't flash a badge at me.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Take a deep breathe and say, I blog, there-fore I am

    ReplyDelete
  15. I blog about, and occasionally litigate about, the right to anonymous speech.
    I hope you'll keep me posted. gtbear at gmail com.
    http://ballots.blogspot.com
    http://vark.blogspot.com
    http://majors.blogspot.com
    - arbitrary aardvark

    ReplyDelete
  16. Comment to the Star Tribune:

    Dear Tim O'Brien (Star Tribune),

    The Star Tribune has accused Michael Brodkorb of having a political bias on his blog, but who are they to talk? The Strib is one of the most liberal newspapers in the county, and you would swear that the editorial board and columnists like comrade Nick Coleman are on the payroll of the DFL. The good thing about Nick is that he is so far left that he is hurting his cause.

    Blogs were created to have an alternative to the liberal media which really should be neutral.

    Thanks,
    dare2sayit.com

    ReplyDelete
  17. Dear Tim O'Brien (Star Tribune),

    The Star Tribune has accused Michael Brodkorb of having a political bias on his blog, but who are they to talk? The Strib is one of the most liberal newspapers in the county, and you would swear that the editorial board and columnists like comrade Nick Coleman are on the payroll of the DFL. The good think about Nick is that he is so far left that he is hurting his cause.

    Blogs were created to have an alternative to the liberal media which really should be neutral.

    Thanks,
    dare2sayit.com

    ReplyDelete